Real-world data support the benefits of CONTINUOUS MICRODOSING™ Delivery The USER Study provides valuable, real-world clinical insights on visual acuity (VA), edema, and safety before and after ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.19 mg implantation At the time of the ILUVIEN Phase 3 clinical trials (FAME), there were no approved treatments for diabetic macular edema (DME); therefore, outcomes in patients after prior injectable therapies could not be assessed In USER, treatments used before and/or after ILUVIEN included laser, intravitreal anti-VEGF, and steroids1 Despite prior treatment, at the time patients received ILUVIEN mean retinal thickness was > 350 microns Limitations of the USER Study Data are based on clinical practice, where the reporting of data is not standardized, and the data may not be as rigorous as in a clinical trial where the data collected are monitored USER involved the collection of data up to 3 years prior to ILUVIEN (where available) and all available data post-ILUVIEN — Mean follow-up after ILUVIEN was 403 days, with 102 eyes followed up for 6 months, 92 for 12 months, and 50 for 18 months Optical coherence tomography (OCT) data were only available for 120 eyes The USER Study consisted of patients with persistent DME and the data confirmed: Patients treated with ILUVIEN with good starting VA maintained VA and those with poor starting VA improved VA 63% of eyes required no additional DME treatment throughout follow-up1 In the 42% of eyes that had a VA of ≥ 20/40 at the time of ILUVIEN treatment, VA was maintained with 87% fewer DME treatments on average In the 20% of eyes that had a VA of < 20/100 at the time of ILUVIEN treatment, VA improved with a reduction in the number of DME treatments on average DME treatment frequency before and after ILUVIEN treatment, entire populationa (N=160 eyes) aMean follow-up after ILUVIEN was 403 days, with 102 eyes followed up for 6 months, 92 for 12 months, and 88 for 15 months. The number of patients available for follow-up at each time point varied. bP0.001 vs treatment frequency before ILUVIEN. cP=0.026 vs treatment frequency before ILUVIEN. USER data confirm the benefits of CONTINUOUS MICRODOSING™ Delivery on retinal edema After treatment with ILUVIEN, patients in the USER Study had a decrease in retinal thickness on average1 After treatment with ILUVIEN, the proportion of eyes with “normal” CST (≤ 300 microns) increased over time1 USER data: Center subfield retinal thickness (CST), OCT population (N=120 eyes) USER data: percentage of eyes with CST ≤ 300 microns, OCT population (N = 120 eyes) The numbers in parentheses represent the number of eyes with data at those time points.Phase 3clinical trialsThe real-world safety and efficacy of ILUVIEN mirror outcomes seen in the ILUVIEN Phase 3 clinical trials (FAME). SEE THE DATAPATIENTcase studyIndividual patient cases illustrate the effects of CONTINUOUS MICRODOSING™ Delivery on retinal stability. Review Case Study